Party/item codes differ; mapping tables and conflict policy are the spine. This page states the phase-one documents, the owner and the acceptance metric. This narrative explains rework risk for «Primary Keys Don't Align: Building Integration ID Maps» and what phase one must freeze.
| Decision lens | Common trap or cost | Safer cut |
|---|---|---|
| PK mismatch | Scope drift | Freeze phase one: map+conflict policy |
| manual recode | Rework/blame | Owners+change orders |
| realtime vanity first | Post-go-live rollback | Accept: conflicts auditable |
Why not all modules for PK mismatch?
All-modules stretch risk; close map+conflict policy first, then extend.
Why custom vs SaaS/package?
Value is auditable boundaries and conflicts auditable, not more menus.
How to estimate time/budget?
By transaction-chain effort for map+conflict policy; change windows priced apart.
How does DaXi Technology accept?
Replay real work for map+conflict policy; metrics in contract—not «feels ok».
Turn «PK mismatch» into an acceptable phase-one loop DaXi Technology scopes «Primary Keys Don't Align: Building Integration ID Maps» with boundaries and acceptance—call +86 139-2520-6166. partner page