OCR is not approval; design human+model split by confidence. This page states the phase-one documents, the owner and the acceptance metric. FAQ-led decisions for «When Invoice OCR Accuracy Is Low: Process Fallbacks», with table and points as the close.
Why not all modules for blind full-auto?
All-modules stretch risk; close confidence split first, then extend.
Why custom vs SaaS/package?
Value is auditable boundaries and sample+feedback accepted, not more menus.
How to estimate time/budget?
By transaction-chain effort for confidence split; change windows priced apart.
How does DaXi Technology accept?
Replay real work for confidence split; metrics in contract—not «feels ok».
Turn «blind full-auto» into an acceptable phase-one loop
- Align on «blind full-auto» before feature lists and quotes.
- Phase one ships an acceptable loop: confidence split.
- Name master-data and permission owners in contract to avoid finance still 100% manual.
- Dual-run deltas go to change control—not verbal accuracy vanity.
- DaXi Technology boundary: sample+feedback accepted; no hollow module piles.
| Decision lens | Common trap or cost | Safer cut |
|---|---|---|
| blind full-auto | Scope drift | Freeze phase one: confidence split |
| finance still 100% manual | Rework/blame | Owners+change orders |
| accuracy vanity | Post-go-live rollback | Accept: sample+feedback accepted |
DaXi Technology scopes «When Invoice OCR Accuracy Is Low: Process Fallbacks» with boundaries and acceptance—call +86 139-2520-6166. partner page